* code tidy up: always evaluates
* tidy up: is always true
* tidy up: remove unused code
* always true/false variables
* unused variable
* tidy up: remove unused code in caretPosition.js
* for squash: Revert "tidy up: remove unused code in caretPosition.js"
The `if` condition was previously always true, so the body should be
preserved. If the body is preserved, other logic can be deleted. I
opened PR #4845 to clean it all up.
This reverts commit 75b03e5a7d.
* for squash: simplify
* for squash: Explain that the getter is used for its side effects
It's very weird to call a getter without using its return value. Add a
comment explaining why this is done so that the reader doesn't get
confused.
* for squash: Revert "tidy up: remove unused code"
The exception test was the purpose of the code.
This reverts commit 85153b1676.
* for squash: Log the tsort results
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Normally I would let `eslint --fix` do this for me, but there's a bug
that causes:
const x = function ()
{
// ...
};
to become:
const x = ()
=> {
// ...
};
which ESLint thinks is a syntax error. (It probably is; I don't know
enough about the automatic semicolon insertion rules to be confident.)
1. Introduce contentcollector.js backend tests
1. Fix issue with OL LI items not being properly numbered after import
1. Fix issue with nested OL LI items being improperly numbered on export
1. Fix issue with new lines not being introduced after lists in on import #3961
1. Sanitize HTML on the way in (import)
1. Fix ExportHTML CSS because it needs to support OL > LI > OL not OL > OL [The latter being the correct format]
1. Fix backend tests.
NB1: needs additional review and testing - no abiword available on my test bed
NB2: in ImportHandler.js, directly delete the file, and handle the eventual
error later: checking before for existence is prone to race conditions,
and does not handle any errors anyway.
The semantics of all the substitutions are identical to what they were before.
I _did_ take the liberty of formatting the CSS to be a bit more readable
(at the cost of adding a little bit of whitespace).
The new hook does the same as exportHtmlAdditionalTags, but is declared
in another hook to avoid confusion about how to export tags when they
are stored as ['tag', 'value'] on attribute pool.
This complements #2762, as per @Gared suggestions.