Reusing the same op object for each iteration can result in very weird
behaviors because previously yielded op objects will get a surprise
mutation.
It is unclear why the code was written to reuse the same object. There
was no comment, nor is there a commit message providing rationale (it
has behaved this way since the very first commit). Perhaps the objects
were reused to improve performance (fewer object allocations that need
to be garbage collected). I do expect this change to reduce
performance somewhat, but not enough to warrant reverting this commit.
* code tidy up: always evaluates
* tidy up: is always true
* tidy up: remove unused code
* always true/false variables
* unused variable
* tidy up: remove unused code in caretPosition.js
* for squash: Revert "tidy up: remove unused code in caretPosition.js"
The `if` condition was previously always true, so the body should be
preserved. If the body is preserved, other logic can be deleted. I
opened PR #4845 to clean it all up.
This reverts commit 75b03e5a7d.
* for squash: simplify
* for squash: Explain that the getter is used for its side effects
It's very weird to call a getter without using its return value. Add a
comment explaining why this is done so that the reader doesn't get
confused.
* for squash: Revert "tidy up: remove unused code"
The exception test was the purpose of the code.
This reverts commit 85153b1676.
* for squash: Log the tsort results
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Clearing the authorship colors of a document with at least two authors, and then
undoing that action caused a disconnect from the pad.
This change disallows undoing clearing authorship colors in order to prevent
the problem from affecting users, and adds the relative test coverage.
This is a change of behaviour, and is documented in the changelog.
Fixes#2802 (sidestepping it).
