The `ep_openid_connect` plugin needs access to session state before
authorization checks are made (to securely redirect the user back to
the start page when authentication completes). Now that the
`expressPreSession` hook exists, the rationale for moving
`preAuthorize` before the `express-session` middleware is gone.
This change undoes the following commits:
* bf35dcfc50
* 0b1ec20c5c
* 30544b564e
There are no guarantees about the order of execution of hook
functions, which means that a plugin's `expressConfigure` hook
function could theoretically register a handler/middleware before the
access check middleware is registered. If that happens, the plugin's
handler would run before the access check, which would be bad. Avoid
the problem by explicitly installing the `webaccess.checkAccess`
middleware before running the `expressConfigure` hook.
Before this commit, webaccess.checkAccess saved the authorization in
user.padAuthorizations[padId] with padId being the read-only pad ID,
however later stages, e.g. in PadMessageHandler, use the real pad ID for
access checks. This led to authorization being denied.
This commit fixes it by only storing and comparing the real pad IDs and
not read-only pad IDs.
This fixes test case "authn user readonly pad -> 200, ok" in
src/tests/backend/specs/socketio.js.
* add more endpoints that do not need a session
* Update src/node/hooks/express/webaccess.js
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
* Update src/node/hooks/express/webaccess.js
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Co-authored-by: John McLear <john@mclear.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
If `settings.json` contains a user without a `password` property then
nobody should be able to log in as that user using the built-in HTTP
basic authentication. This is true both with and without this change,
but before this change it wasn't immediately obvious that a malicious
user couldn't use an empty or null password to log in as such a user.
This commit adds an explicit nullish check and some unit tests to
ensure that an empty or null password will not work if the `password`
property is null or undefined.
If a hook function neither calls the callback nor returns a
(non-undefined) value then there's no way for the hook system to know
if/when the hook function has finished.
This currently isn't absolutely necessary because all current callers
of `userCanModify` already check for a read-only pad ID themselves.
However:
* This adds defense in depth.
* This makes it possible to simply replace the import handler's
`allowAnyoneToImport` check with a call to `userCanModify`.
Before this change, the authorize hook was invoked twice: once before
authentication and again after (if settings.requireAuthorization is
true). Now pre-authentication authorization is instead handled by a
new preAuthorize hook, and the authorize hook is only invoked after
the user has authenticated.
Rationale: Without this change it is too easy to write an
authorization plugin that is too permissive. Specifically:
* If the plugin does not check the path for /admin then a non-admin
user might be able to access /admin pages.
* If the plugin assumes that the user has already been authenticated
by the time the authorize function is called then unauthenticated
users might be able to gain access to restricted resources.
This change also avoids calling the plugin's authorize function twice
per access, which makes it easier for plugin authors to write an
authorization plugin that is easy to understand.
This change may break existing authorization plugins: After this
change, the authorize hook will no longer be able to authorize
non-admin access to /admin pages. This is intentional. Access to admin
pages should instead be controlled via the `is_admin` user setting,
which can be set in the config file or by an authentication plugin.
Also:
* Add tests for the authenticate and authorize hooks.
* Disable the authentication failure delay when testing.
This loses some of the granularity of the default HTTP basic auth
(unknown username vs. bad password), but there is considerable value
in having logging that is consistent no matter what authentication
plugins are installed.
This makes it possible for reverse proxies to transform 403 errors
into something like "upgrade to a premium account to access this
pad".
Also add some webaccess tests.
Before, a malicious user could bypass authorization restrictions
imposed by the authorize hook:
* Step 1: Fetch any resource that the malicious user is authorized to
access (e.g., static content).
* Step 2: Use the signed express_sid cookie generated in step 1 to
create a socket.io connection.
* Step 3: Perform the CLIENT_READY handshake for the desired pad.
* Step 4: Profit!
Now the authorization decision made by the authorize hook is
propagated to SecurityManager so that it can approve or reject
socket.io messages as appropriate.
This also sets up future support for per-user read-only and
modify-only (no create) authorization levels.
Authentication plugins almost always want to read and modify
`settings.users`. The settings can already be accessed in a few other
ways, but this is much more convenient.
The authorization logic determines whether the user has already
successfully authenticated by looking to see if `req.session.user`
exists. If an authentication plugin says that it successfully
authenticated the user but it did not create `req.session.user` then
authentication will re-run for every access, and authorization plugins
will be unable to determine whether the user has been authenticated.
Return a 500 internal server error to prevent these problems.
Not all authentication plugins require the Authorization header, so it
might not be present in subsequent attempts. (In particular, a reverse
proxy might strip it.)
* Improve the comment describing how the access check works.
* Move the `authenticate` logic to where it is used so that people
don't have to keep jumping back and forth to understand how the
access check works.
* Break up the three steps to reduce the number of indentation
levels and improve readability. This should also make it easier to
implement and review planned future changes.
