* Lint functions
* Fix assignment of `settings.minify`
* Use a for loop to avoid copied code for the `minify = true` and
`minify = false` cases
* Put each resource fetch into its own test case
* Check for 200 status code
* Use `.expect()` to check header value
* Use `.expect(fn)` instead of `.then(fn)`
Firefox 52 has issues with rendering SVG animations which caused random tests to fail. Less than 2% of total Firefox users now use Firefox 52 so we're safe to drop testing for it.
The testing approach was redone to fix numerous issues:
* Even if the tests had been working, none of them would have caught
https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/issues/4808 because they
didn't exercise the client-side import logic. Now they do.
* Follow-up logic was not in the `helper.waitFor()` callback like it
should have been. Now the code uses `async` and `await` to ensure
proper execution order.
* All `$.ajax()` calls used `async: false`. Now they're properly
asynchronous.
* The `helper.waitFor()` condition callbacks threw instead of
returning false.
* The string comparisons didn't allow for different attribute
order (e.g., `<ol start="1" class="list-number1">` vs. `<ol
class="list-number1" start="1">`). Now `Node.isEqualNode()` is
used to reduce fragility. (`Node.isEqualNode()` is not perfect, so
the tests are still a bit fragile: If class names or style strings
are in a different order then `Node.isEqualNode()` will return
false even if the nodes are semantically equivalent.)
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
* CI: Leave log level at INFO for frontend tests
* CI: Disable frontend admin tests for non-admin workflow
* CI: Disable import/export rate limiting for frontend tests
* tests: fix importexport tests
The testing approach was redone to fix numerous issues:
* Even if the tests had been working, none of them would have caught
https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/issues/4808 because they
didn't exercise the client-side import logic. Now they do.
* Follow-up logic was not in the `helper.waitFor()` callback like it
should have been. Now the code uses `async` and `await` to ensure
proper execution order.
* All `$.ajax()` calls used `async: false`. Now they're properly
asynchronous.
* The `helper.waitFor()` condition callbacks threw instead of
returning false.
* The string comparisons didn't allow for different attribute
order (e.g., `<ol start="1" class="list-number1">` vs. `<ol
class="list-number1" start="1">`). Now `Node.isEqualNode()` is
used to reduce fragility. (`Node.isEqualNode()` is not perfect, so
the tests are still a bit fragile: If class names or style strings
are in a different order then `Node.isEqualNode()` will return
false even if the nodes are semantically equivalent.)
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Co-authored-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
Due to a recent release that wasn't functioning properly this CI will help us catch the majority of Microsoft Node Quirks before they make it into a release.
* tests: Restore `runnerBackend.sh`
`runnerBackend.sh` was deleted in commit
7dae5e3db8 but plugins still need it
until their GitHub workflow definitions have been updated.
Co-authored-by: John McLear <john@mclear.co.uk>
Logging verbosity of the openapi handlers was turned down so GitHub
should be happier with INFO now. This makes it easier to troubleshoot
problems.
This reverts commit b98aaf4904.
`waitForPromise()` should always be used with `await` (either directly
or with a later `await` on the returned Promise). In this case,
the condition should be immediately true so `waitForPromise()` is not
the right tool here.
All of the tests in this file are commented out so this file does
nothing. We can uncomment the code and clean it up, but the approach
taken in these tests will never work: For security reasons, browsers
do not allow synthetic key events to perform the default
behavior (such as moving the carent when an arrow key is pressed).
There are two ways to test responses to navigation keys:
* Use WebDriver to create "genuine" keyboard events.
* Suppress the default behavior and implement caret movement
ourselves. This is tremendously complicated, especially arrow
up/down.
